As financial advisors, it’s crucial to craft portfolios that maximize returns while minimizing risks. One effective strategy is diversification within the equity market using Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). This article explores how to achieve diversification beyond traditional large-cap indexes like the S&P 500, Russell 1000, and Russell 3000, which offer limited diversification power due to high correlations.
Understanding the Limitations of Traditional Indexes
Market-weighted large and mid-cap indexes (such as the S&P 500, Russell 1000, and Russell 3000) are often the cornerstone of equity portfolios. However, their high correlations (+98%) with each other reduce their diversification benefits. Additionally, these indexes have substantial exposure to mega-cap stocks, which can dominate portfolio performance:
Company | S&P 500 | Russell 1000 | Russell 3000 |
Microsoft | 7.14% | 6.29% | 6.00% |
Apple | 6.10% | 5.39% | 5.10% |
NVIDIA | 5.77% | 4.45% | 4.20% |
Amazon | 3.72% | 3.42% | 3.20% |
4.20% | 3.90% | 3.70% | |
META | 2.30% | 2.10% | 2.00% |
Total | 29.23% | 25.55% | 24.20% |
With nearly a quarter of the portfolio tied to just a few companies, the diversification power of these indexes is further compromised.
Alternative Diversification Strategies
To achieve better diversification, consider incorporating mid-cap, small-cap, and international ETFs, which exhibit lower correlations with the S&P 500 and a lower concentration in the top positions.
Diversifying with Mid-Cap and Small-Cap ETFs
Mid-cap and small-cap ETFs provide exposure to a broader range of companies, reducing the dominance of mega-caps in your portfolio:
• Mid Cap (IJH): Correlation with S&P 500 is 91%
• Russell 2000 (VTWO): Correlation with S&P 500 is 88%
Adding International Exposure
International stocks offer a significant diversification benefit, with correlations to the S&P 500 below 85%:
• Europe (SPEU): Correlation with S&P 500 is 85%
• Japan (FLJP): Correlation with S&P 500 is 75%
• Asia Pacific (VPL): Correlation with S&P 500 is 85%
• Emerging Markets (VWO): Correlation with S&P 500 is 76%
• China (FLCH): Correlation with S&P 500 is 51%
• India (FLIN): Correlation with S&P 500 is 67%
Building a Balanced Equity Portfolio
To create a balanced equity portfolio, we recommend the following allocation. This strategy aims to achieve attractive returns while minimizing the risks associated with market dynamics and mega-cap dominance:
ETF Used | Weight Top 10 | Correlation (SPY) | Proposed Portfolio Investment | 5-Yr Returns |
SPLG (S&P 500) | 33.8% | 100 | 40% | $40,000 |
IJH (Mid Cap) | 7.1% | 91 | 10% | $10,000 |
VTWO (Russell 2000) | 6.8% | 88 | 10% | $10,000 |
SPEU (Europe) | 19.5% | 85 | 12% | $12,000 |
FLJP (Japan) | 23.5% | 75 | 7% | $7,000 |
VPL (Asia Pacific) | 17.2% | 85 | 7% | $7,000 |
VWO (Emerging Markets) | 20.0% | 76 | 10% | $10,000 |
FLIN (India) | 30.9% | 67 | 4% | $4,000 |
This portfolio reduces exposure to top positions to 13.73% while providing exposure to over 5,000 stocks. The overall correlation with the S&P 500 is lowered to 90%, ensuring better diversification.
Conclusion
Diversification within the equity market using ETFs is an effective strategy to manage risks and enhance returns. By strategically allocating to mid-cap, small-cap, and international ETFs, financial advisors can create more resilient portfolios. This approach not only reduces over-reliance on mega-cap stocks but also provides broader market exposure, helping to protect against potential shifts in market dynamics.
We used CITEC AI platform to select, compare, analyze, and backtesting potential strategies.